Page 1 of 1

Chauvet DMX-AN vs DMX-AN2

PostPosted: 30 August 2019, 21:44
by gymclubdjs
Hi All!

We are considering the purchase of an Chauvet DMX-AN or DMX-AN2 controller, but have been unable to understand whether there are any perceptive advantages from one controller over the other?

Further... Do either the Chauvet DMX-AN or DMX-AN2 provide signal buffering, like the Enttec ODE MK2, which prevents latency between the computer => controller => fixtures?

Thank you for your assistance.

Kind Regards,


Gary

Re: Chauvet DMX-AN vs DMX-AN2

PostPosted: 03 September 2019, 14:40
by Allan
Hi Gary,

The DMX-AN2 replaced the DMX-AN. We added optical and electrical isolation, an automatic re-direct (if you change the IP address) and updated the web-based GUI.
Neither model provides any signal buffering.

Re: Chauvet DMX-AN vs DMX-AN2

PostPosted: 05 September 2019, 09:20
by gymclubdjs
Hi Allan!

Thank you for the quick feature difference between the DMX-AN and DMX-AN2.

Do any of the Chauvet Xpress or DMX controllers provide signal buffering?

If not... You might consider it for future offerings.

Thanks, again, for the information.

Kind Regards,


Gary

Re: Chauvet DMX-AN vs DMX-AN2

PostPosted: 05 September 2019, 10:44
by support
Hello Gary,
Could you please give more details about the purpose of "signal buffering" for a dmx interface ?

Re: Chauvet DMX-AN vs DMX-AN2

PostPosted: 06 September 2019, 12:04
by gymclubdjs
Support,

Allan understands the question related to signal buffering.

I will wait for his reply.

Regards,


Gary

Re: Chauvet DMX-AN vs DMX-AN2

PostPosted: 07 September 2019, 15:35
by support
Well noted, Gary.